Fact #1: Women are in a disadvantageous situation in the workplace.
Fact #2: Men are in a disadvantageous situation in family courts.
Fact #3: The legal system political purpose is to preserve the status quo.
The issue of the inequality between genders is in fact an issue about how societies develop their approach to gender roles. The traditional roles assigned to men and women, on which men were assigned to the workplace and women were limited to the domestic realm, are ruthlessly preserved by our legal system and the network of social structures that support it.
Someone would reply that the legal system has passed laws that state the equality of genders at the workplace and at family courts, but the reality is that the same legal system that passed those laws is the one that blocks their enforcement by the intricate placement of financial and procedural roadblocks, with the only purpose of discouraging the victims of discrimination of claiming their legal rights.
It is time already to update not only laws, but also the legal system processes of enforcing them, so that courts procedures match the current stage of modern societies’ development, on which women are a necessary part of our workforce, and men take care of their children in households headed by married couples. Genders should be equal in every field of our lives.
So let us fight for gender equality. The times demand it. And our children are waiting for it.
adoption (3) Amor de Papá (1) Asociación de Padres de Familia Separados (APFS) (1) Brooklyn White (1) Canadian Equal Parenting Council (1) Catalonia (1) child custody (55) child support (9) children's rights (5) Colombia (1) Daniel Malakov (1) David N. Heleniak (3) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (1) domestic violence (16) DSM-5 (3) elections (3) European Court of Human Rights (1) extended family (2) family courts (31) family laws (38) fatherlessness (7) fathers (49) Fathers and Families (6) fathers rights (1) Fathers' Rights (1) gender discrimination (15) gender violence (2) Germany (1) Glenn Sacks (1) Gloria Steinem (1) God (1) James Cook (1) joint custody (46) Langeac Declaration (2) men's rights (3) Miguel Angel Salgado Pimentel (1) Montclair NJ (1) mothers (19) Padres Sí Somos (2) Parental Alienation Syndrome (3) parental kidnapping (2) parenting styles (1) PAS (1) PIP (1) PNP (1) PPD (1) Puerto Rico (3) Rhonda Gale (1) Robert Franklin (1) schools (2) shared parenting (4) signe wilkinson (1) single fathers (5) single mothers (7) Stephen Baskerville (2) Thanksgiving (2) The Colbert Report (1) The Fresh Air Fund (1) Tim Loughton (1) Tories (1) UN (1) UNICEF (1) United Nation's Rights of the Child Convention (1) visitation (1) women's rights (4)
PRO-JOINT CUSTODY ORGANIZATIONS
- Asociación Española Multidisciplinar de Investigación sobre Interferencias Parentales (ASEMIP)
- Canadian Equal Parenting Council
- Center for Parental Responsibility
- Children's Rights Council
- Grandparents Rights Organization
- Joint Custody Association of Norway
- Kids Need 2 Parents
- National Parents Organization
- Padres y Madres en Acción
- Parental Alienation Awareness Organization
- Plataforma por la Custodia Compartida
FATHER'S RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS
- American Coalition for Fathers and Children
- Amor de Papá
- Asociación Catalana de Padres Separados
- Dads America
- Dads4Kids: Fatherhood Foundation
- Fathers 4 Justice
- Glenn Sacks
- Great Dad
- Illinois Fathers
- Louisiana Dads
- Padres de la Guarda
- The Fatherhood Educational Institute
- The National Fathers Resource Center